Search site

Become a member
Congratulatory Letters
Become a member

Become a member

New Members of USUBC
From January 2007

  1. American Continental Group, LLC
  2. Atlantic Group
  3. Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
  4. Bunge North America
  5. Cardinal Resources
  6. Cisco Systems
  7. The Coca-Cola Company
  8. The Eurasia Foundation
  9. Holtec International
  10. Kennan Institute
  11. Kyiv-Atlantic Group of Companies
  12. Marathon Oil Corporation
  13. Marks, Sokolov & Burd LLC
  14. Northrop Grumman
  15. Open World Leadership Center
  16. Shell Oil Company
  17. TD International, LLC
  18. The State Export-Import Bank of Ukraine
  19. U.S. Civilian Research & Development Foundation (CRDF)
  20. U.S.-Ukraine Foundation
  21. Ukrainian American Bar Association (UABA)
  22. Ukrainian-American Environmental Association
  23. Ukrainian Development Company
  24. Vanco Energy Company
  25. Ukrainian Federation of America
  26. UPS
  27. Softline Company
  28. International Tax & Investment Center (ITIC)
  29. MaxWell Biocorporation
  30. Baker & McKenzie
  31. Dipol Chemical International Inc.
  32. Och-Ziff Capital Management
  33. MJA Asset Management, LLC
  34. General Dynamics
  35. Lockheed Martin Corporation
  36. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey
  37. Halliburton
  38. DLA Piper Ukraine, LLC
  39. EPAM Systems
  40. DHL
  41. Air Tractor, Inc.
  42. Magisters
  43. Ernst & Young LLC
  44. Umbra, LLC
  45. US PolyTech
  46. Rakotis
  47. Crumpton Group
  48. Vision TV LLC
  49. Standard Chartered Bank
  50. American Councils for International Education
  51. Intercontinental Commerce Corporation (ICC)
  52. TNK-BP Commerce LLC
  53. Nationwide Equipment Company
  54. IMTC-MEI
  55. First International Resources LLC
  56. Doheny Global Group
  57. Foyil Securities, Inc.
  58. KPMG
  59. Asters Law Firm
  60. Solid Team LLC
  61. R & J Trading International, Inc.
  62. Vasil Kisil & Partners Law Firm
  63. AeroSvit Ukrainian Airlines
  64. ContourGlobal Ukraine
  65. Winner Imports Ukraine, Ltd.
  66. The Anemone Group
  67. 3M
  68. CEC Government Relations
  69. IBM Ukraine
  70. Edelman Europe
  71. RZB Finance LLC
  72. SoftServe, Inc.
  73. The Washington Group
  74. SE Raelin/Cajo, Inc.
  75. Mars Ukraine L.L.C.
  76. AnaCom, Inc.
  77. Pratt & Whitney – Paton
  78. Zurich Surety, Credit & Political Risk
  79. AGCO Corporation
  80. Aitken Berlin LLP/HSIA
  81. Microsoft
  82. Kyiv Mohyla Foundation of America (KMF)
  83. Ukraine International Airlines (UIA)
  84. DRS Technologies, Inc.
  85. Defense Technology Inc. (DTI)
  86. Dunwoodie Travel Bureau, Ltd.
  87. Commonwealth Energy Partners
  88. International Services Corporation (ISC)
  89. Broad Street Capital Group
  90. Charles H. Camp, Esquire, Law Offices of Charles H. Camp, Washington, D.C.
  91. Baker Tilly Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  92. Maryland Department of Business & Economic Development, Division of International Investment & Trade
  93. Ukrainian American Coordinating Council (UACC)
  94. Blufer & Associates
  95. Foundation for International Arts and Education (FIAE)
  96. Chevron
  97. PetRus USA, LLC
  98. United Coal Company/System Capital Management
  99. Kyiv Global
  100. Eurasia Business Consultancy
  101. Amity Technology
  102. Eli Lilly and Company
  103. Louis Dreyfus Commodities
  104. Raytheon Company
  105. Providence Equity


Welcome to the U.S.-Ukraine Business Council

UKRAINE SHOWS FIRST SIGNS OF ECONOMIC RECOVERY, YET SITUATION REMAINS CHALLENGING: GDP MAY FALL BY 14% IN 2009, SAY EXPERTS 

Interfax-Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, Friday, October 23, 2009 

KYIV - Despite the first signs of economic recovery, the situation in Ukraine in the near-term will remain challenging: Ukraine's GDP may fall by 14% in the 12 months of 2009, experts have said.

This opinion was shared by participants in a press conference in Kyiv on Wednesday, which summed up the First Annual International Forum on the economic development of Ukraine.

The forum, which took place in Washington, the United States, on October 15, 2009, was attended by over 300 representatives from the world's largest companies, international institutions, financial organizations, namely from the International Monetary Fund, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the World Bank, the European Union, as well as high-ranking officials. In particular, among the forum's attendees were Ukrainian Vice Premier Hryhoriy Nemyria and Ukrainian Economy Minister Bohdan Danylyshyn.

Speaking at the press conference in Kyiv, Director of the Institute for Economics and Forecasting under the National Academy of Sciences Valeriy Heyets said that despite the fact that the pace of economic decline in Ukraine has slowed recently, the general economic situation remains challenging.

The CEO of the Bleyzer Foundation, Oleh Ustenko, agreed. He said that the long-term economic forecast for Ukraine remains favorable, although the state of affairs of business environments should be improved to attract investment as a key source of economic growth.

According to the analytical materials issued at the press conference, Ukraine has survived one of the most serious downturns and the strongest devaluation of the national currency at the peak of crisis: in autumn 2008 the national currency fell by over 50% against the U.S. dollar, and the PFTS stock index plunged by over 70%, while real annual GDP shrank by 8% and 19% in Q4, 2008 and in H1, 2009 respectively. Moreover, over the last two months 2008, exports of goods fell by 16% in the annual terms, and in January-July 2009 they fell by 49%.

Starting from spring 2009, more signs that the economic adjustment has reached bottom in the industrial, trade and construction sectors have appeared.

"The further improvement of the economic situation this year will continue thanks to a low statistical base and thanks to recovery of commodity and material stocks and the introduction of fiscal stimuli. The reinforcement of the international economy will promote the more rapid recovery of Ukraine," the experts said.

Among the key achievement of the Ukrainian government in fighting the crisis were agreements with the International Monetary Fund (IMF, the Stand-By program worth $16.4 billion), and with the World Bank and other international financial institutions, which mitigated refinancing of the short-term foreign debt; the high level of fiscal discipline; the cut of the budget's deficit in 2010 to 4% of GDP and satisfaction of IMF quantity criteria regarding the monetary base.

However, the experts said that the Ukrainian government has not drawn up a common coordinated strategy for overcoming the crisis, has not allocated enough funds to support the domestic economy, while the rise in crediting stopped too sharply. The use of funds given by the cabinet to support liquidity was not controlled in the proper manner.

"It's likely that the funds were spent on the purchase of foreign currency to take aboard and not on the recovery of the domestic crediting market. This strengthened the devaluation pressure on the hryvnia," the experts said.

The Ukrainian cabinet has not implemented an IMF requirement to increase prices of gas for households, and on utility public services, to realize a comprehensive strategy aimed at restoration of solvency of Naftogaz Ukrainy and the Pension Fund, to realize initial privatization plans, which affected the financing of the national budget, the experts said.

According to the press conference materials, it is important to receive financial support from the IMF to avoid a worsening of the downturn within the next six months. The authorities should introduce a number of key economic measures agreed with the IMF, reads the document.

"In 2009, the deficit of the national budget should not exceed 6% of GDP, and the national budget for 2010 should foresee a deficit not exceeding 4%. This means that the increase of pensions and minimum wages should not be higher than inflation. Tax relaxations and a moratorium on tax audits should not be adopted.

"The financial state of Naftogaz Ukrainy and the Pension Fund should be improved to a level that will prevent there being a need for extra aid using budget funds," read the materials.

As for monetary policy, the experts said that the NBU should try not to print too much money and refuse proposals to finance projects linked to preparations for the Euro 2012 European football championship using the NBU's profit; to avoid monetization of the deficit of the national budget; improve the transparency of the bank refinancing policy and strictly control target usage of funds allocated to banks.

"The Ukrainian authorities will have to use new ways to increase direct domestic and foreign investment, which will promote growth in production and the creation of new jobs to boost the pace of economic development," the experts said.

 

Action Ukraine Report Subscribe

Action Ukraine History Report

Aerosvit

Ukraine International Airlines

Dunwoodie Travel Bureau

Economic Development Forum

Ukrainian Agriculture

Express Operators Report

Software Piracy Report

Ukraine Assessment Report

Ukraine Quest for Mature Nation Conference

Ukraine IT Outsourcing

Ukraine Macroeconomic Report

OECD Ukraine report

Ukraine Investment Barriers